msys2 + mingw building performance

I'm trying to build some libraries, and some of them don't make it easy to build on Windows. Various places suggest using msys or the updated msys2 with MinGW to emulate(?) a linux environment to build the libraries.

My question is: does using msys, as opposed to just MinGW, affect the performance of the libraries and eventual programs built? Or, would the end result be the same result as the program that would be created if I did find a way to build it with MinGW without using msys2?

In other words, does msys2 sacrifice any performance for compatibility with windows?
No, there's no difference in performance.
Thank you for the confirmation.
Registered users can post here. Sign in or register to post.
<blockquote id="pwjBlLZ"><tr id="pwjBlLZ"></tr></blockquote>
<delect id="pwjBlLZ"><option id="pwjBlLZ"><blockquote id="pwjBlLZ"></blockquote></option></delect>
<delect id="pwjBlLZ"><option id="pwjBlLZ"><blockquote id="pwjBlLZ"></blockquote></option></delect><blockquote id="pwjBlLZ"><option id="pwjBlLZ"></option></blockquote>
<delect id="pwjBlLZ"><option id="pwjBlLZ"><blockquote id="pwjBlLZ"></blockquote></option></delect>
<delect id="pwjBlLZ"></delect>
<delect id="pwjBlLZ"></delect>
<blockquote id="pwjBlLZ"></blockquote>
<delect id="pwjBlLZ"><option id="pwjBlLZ"></option></delect>
<delect id="pwjBlLZ"><option id="pwjBlLZ"></option></delect>
<delect id="pwjBlLZ"></delect>
<mark id="pwjBlLZ"></mark>
<delect id="pwjBlLZ"></delect>
<delect id="pwjBlLZ"></delect>
<nav id="pwjBlLZ"><tr id="pwjBlLZ"><address id="pwjBlLZ"></address></tr></nav>
<blockquote id="pwjBlLZ"></blockquote>
<delect id="pwjBlLZ"></delect>
<mark id="pwjBlLZ"><tr id="pwjBlLZ"></tr></mark>
<delect id="pwjBlLZ"><option id="pwjBlLZ"><blockquote id="pwjBlLZ"></blockquote></option></delect>
<blockquote id="pwjBlLZ"></blockquote>
<delect id="pwjBlLZ"><option id="pwjBlLZ"><blockquote id="pwjBlLZ"></blockquote></option></delect>
<blockquote id="pwjBlLZ"><option id="pwjBlLZ"></option></blockquote>
<delect id="pwjBlLZ"></delect>
<delect id="pwjBlLZ"></delect>
  • 629832435 2018-04-20
  • 4254782434 2018-04-20
  • 7642392433 2018-04-20
  • 4201592432 2018-04-20
  • 1221362431 2018-04-20
  • 5455692430 2018-04-20
  • 8345962429 2018-04-20
  • 7297372428 2018-04-20
  • 4929522427 2018-04-20
  • 1938132426 2018-04-20
  • 2267862425 2018-04-20
  • 6177082424 2018-04-20
  • 838232423 2018-04-20
  • 4694502422 2018-04-20
  • 6512882421 2018-04-19
  • 4659652420 2018-04-19
  • 2967832419 2018-04-19
  • 8339042418 2018-04-19
  • 8147112417 2018-04-19
  • 2774752416 2018-04-19